Why do actors who did educational programming before they became famous not include it in their resume`?

I mean in my opinion it looks good, to the public, if not to the directors, etc., it's good p.r. Things like the Electric Company, which Morgan Freeman and Rita Moreno, among others, did, should only make them look better in the eyes of the public.Why do actors who did educational programming before they became famous not include it in their resume`?
Because a ';smart'; applicant customizes his resume to appeal to the person(s) doing the hiring... not what looks good to the public. The public does not pay their salary.





Edit: Sorry, darlin', but the public does NOT pay their salary... the production company does. While ULTIMATELY the public decides whether the movie is popular or not, the production company makes the hiring/firing decisions. And these days, a lot of those decisions are based on GLOBAL appeal, not local USA appeal. And believe me, some guy in Yugoslavia isn't going to care whether Morgan Freeman made a PBS educational promo.Why do actors who did educational programming before they became famous not include it in their resume`?
because nobody really watches educational programming, it's really boring
um. maby it doesn't really matter to them